Once logicians define demonstration as a reason factor that is formed by definite preliminaries and it has a definite result then by explaining factors such as priori criteria the principle of “the caused” and condition of demonstration preliminaries settle the contraction and expansion of demonstration distribution for example they make sure just the prior demonstration by stating the principle of “the caused” Now this question is raised among influential criteria of demonstration distribution one is helpful to solve this conflict?
The writer tries to focus firstly an influential factors in demonstration distribution chapter and to specify the ones which are inexpressive such as the principle of “the caused” then by emphasize on the Ṣadr al-Muta’allihīn opinion among different opinions tries to receive demonstration as a reason with definite preliminaries and therefore definite results, afterward in demonstration distribution by observing supplier to definite condition a prior demonstration is not within the definition of reason
ranjbar, M. (2024). The effective factors on the demonstration define and distribution. Theosophia Practica, (), -. doi: 10.22081/pwq.2025.38332.291
MLA
ranjbar, M. . "The effective factors on the demonstration define and distribution", Theosophia Practica, , , 2024, -. doi: 10.22081/pwq.2025.38332.291
HARVARD
ranjbar, M. (2024). 'The effective factors on the demonstration define and distribution', Theosophia Practica, (), pp. -. doi: 10.22081/pwq.2025.38332.291
CHICAGO
M. ranjbar, "The effective factors on the demonstration define and distribution," Theosophia Practica, (2024): -, doi: 10.22081/pwq.2025.38332.291
VANCOUVER
ranjbar, M. The effective factors on the demonstration define and distribution. Theosophia Practica, 2024; (): -. doi: 10.22081/pwq.2025.38332.291
)